Let's talk about 
Carbon Dioxide is NOT a pollutant.

Rather, it is a colourless, odorless gas, vital to life on planet earth.

96% of annual carbon dioxide emissions are produced by nature, with human emissions only contributing 4%.
 
 

A climate model will only fly properly when construction is not flawed

Basic climate model dated 1896
The basic climate model, used to calculate the Earth’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide, dates back to 1896. It is the cornerstone of the carbon dioxide theory of global warming. Predating computer simulations, it is the application of “basic physics” to the climate.
Scientific Method must question
Generations of climate scientists have convinced themselves that this logic is correct. But what if they got it wrong? The scientific method demands that scientists question theories not supported by observation.
Climate Model contains fatal flaw
Because of the numerous mismatches with observations, the computer models and the basic model would in science, normally be called into question. The alarming global warming predictions and proposed prosperity destroying remedies are entirely based on calculations with models. The models should have been questioned before now. Dr. Evans’ questioning and due diligence on the architecture of the basic model has revealed the fatal flaw, which he has now corrected.
  1. Lorem ipsum
  2. Lorem ipsum
  3. Lorem ipsum
  4. Lorem ipsum
  5. Lorem ipsum

Climate Change Due Diligence Specifications

Large pension, superannuation and other asset management funds [and of course governments, scientific organisations and businesses] need to constantly review their due diligence activities as applied to the science, economics and finance of everything, e.g. global warming.
 
Have the directors of these funds actually examined the scientific, economic and financial evidence on the global warming hypothesis?

Have the directors done anything other than listen to argumentative evidence free noise from 'authority'? Have they properly evaluated the actual evidence as applied to the science, economics and finance of global warming?
 
 
We can assist the directors of the large pension, superannuation and other asset management funds to ensure they have fully 'hedged their bets' in relation to their due diligence obligations and in particular to climate change of whatever sign [cooling or warming] which occurs next.
  1. Deconstructing the CAGW hypothesis - Part One
    Human emissions of carbon dioxide is the main cause of increasing atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide -
  2. Deconstructing the CAGW hypothesis - Part Two
    - is the main cause of rapid, dangerous, unprecedented increases in near surface average global temperatures -
  3. Deconstructing the CAGW hypothesis - Part Three
    - is the main cause of rapidly rising, sea levels, storm energy intensity and polar ice melt or unpredictable climate change.
  4. Deconstructing the CAGW hypothesis - Part Four
    Part One is still hotly debated. Natural carbon dioxide emissions swamp human emissions and ice core data shows global rise in temperatures precede CO2 rise
  5. Deconstructing the CAGW hypothesis - Part Five
    Part Two - is clearly refuted by the evidence - rapidly rising emissions - no increase in temperatures and the work (Evans) demonstrating climate sensitivity exaggerated.
  6. Deconstructing the CAGW hypothesis - Part Six
    As neither unnatural rises in sea levels, storm energy intensity nor polar ice melt is occuring - unpredictable, unprecedented climate change is not happening